Preparation of scientific texts
Informacje ogólne
| Kod przedmiotu: | 0000-DSK060 |
| Kod Erasmus / ISCED: | (brak danych) / (brak danych) |
| Nazwa przedmiotu: | Preparation of scientific texts |
| Jednostka: | Uniwersytet Łódzki |
| Grupy: | |
| Punkty ECTS i inne: |
(brak)
|
| Język prowadzenia: | angielski |
| Wymagania wstępne: | (tylko po angielsku) Writing and Publishing in Academia |
| Skrócony opis: |
(tylko po angielsku) This programme is offered to first year doctoral students studying within the social sciences and is suitable for a wide range of disciplines as it focuses on generic skills. The programme will support students in preparing either a detailed publication plan and outline academic article OR in producing their first academic article for submission to a discipline-appropriate journal. It should be noted that where the student aims to produce a first academic article, they will either need solid original data from previous studies (e.g., master’s dissertation) or might focus on expanding the definition of a concept or developing a thorough literature review. The programme provides directed learning through lectures and workshops, with the expectation that students will undertake at least fifty hours of private study in addition to complete the programme effectively, submitting a substantial draft of their first journal article for assessment. |
| Efekty uczenia się: |
(tylko po angielsku) knowledge: PhD students will know how to identify an appropriate journal and prepare a paper for publication in that journal. SDNS_W04 skills: PhD students will develop skills to support their academic writing at a level appropriate for a career in academia. SDNS_U02 PhD students will develop an appropriate skill set that will allow them to prepare a discipline-specific article. SDNS_U3 social competences (attitudes): PhD students will understand the metrics used in ranking journals. SDNS_K01 Students will apply the metrics used in ranking journals in selecting a journal to target. SDNS_K02 |
Zajęcia w cyklu "Rok akademicki 2024/2025" (w trakcie)
| Okres: | 2024-10-01 - 2025-09-30 |
 
PN WT ŚR CZ PT |
| Typ zajęć: |
Konwersatorium, 26 godzin
|
|
| Koordynatorzy: | Ilona Świątek-Barylska | |
| Prowadzący grup: | Ilona Świątek-Barylska | |
| Lista studentów: | (nie masz dostępu) | |
| Zaliczenie: | Ocena zgodna z regulaminem studiów |
Zajęcia w cyklu "Rok akademicki 2023/2024" (zakończony)
| Okres: | 2023-10-01 - 2024-09-30 |
PN WT ŚR CZ PT |
| Typ zajęć: |
Konwersatorium, 26 godzin
|
|
| Koordynatorzy: | Carolyn Downs, Ilona Świątek-Barylska | |
| Prowadzący grup: | Carolyn Downs, Ilona Świątek-Barylska | |
| Lista studentów: | (nie masz dostępu) | |
| Zaliczenie: | Ocena zgodna z regulaminem studiów |
Zajęcia w cyklu "Rok akademicki 2022/2023" (zakończony)
| Okres: | 2022-10-01 - 2023-09-30 |
PN WT ŚR CZ PT |
| Typ zajęć: |
Konwersatorium, 26 godzin
|
|
| Koordynatorzy: | Carolyn Downs, Ilona Świątek-Barylska | |
| Prowadzący grup: | Carolyn Downs, Ilona Świątek-Barylska | |
| Lista studentów: | (nie masz dostępu) | |
| Zaliczenie: |
Przedmiot -
Ocena zgodna z regulaminem studiów
Konwersatorium - Ocena zgodna z regulaminem studiów |
|
| Czy kurs na PZK?: | T |
|
Zajęcia w cyklu "Rok akademicki 2021/2022" (zakończony)
| Okres: | 2021-10-01 - 2022-09-30 |
PN WT ŚR CZ PT |
| Typ zajęć: |
Konwersatorium, 26 godzin
|
|
| Koordynatorzy: | Ilona Świątek-Barylska | |
| Prowadzący grup: | Carolyn Downs | |
| Lista studentów: | (nie masz dostępu) | |
| Zaliczenie: |
Przedmiot -
Ocena zgodna z regulaminem studiów
Konwersatorium - Ocena zgodna z regulaminem studiów |
|
| Metody dydaktyczne: | (tylko po angielsku) Nine Lectures, each 45 minutes long, and pre-recorded Nine workshops, taking place online One-to-one appointments for students to discuss assignment and draft academic articles. |
|
| Sposoby i kryteria oceniania: | (tylko po angielsku) Assessment is as follows: Students will prepare a detailed plan for their journal article (around 1500 words) the plan should include the following information 1. Title of Journal targeted and reason for choice of journal 2. Title of proposed paper 3. Abstract for proposed paper 4. Type of paper (e.g. research, conceptual, review) 5. Outline of indicative content of paper (substantive content of assignment) 6. Timeline for completion of paper 7. Details of any co-author and their contribution to paper Marking Criteria Grade Assignment grade descriptors 70% to 100% Excellent Pass Exemplary range and depth of attainment of intended learning outcomes, secured by discriminating command of a comprehensive range of relevant materials and analyses, and by deployment of considered judgement relating to key issues, concepts, and procedures. 60% to 69% Good pass Conclusive attainment of virtually all intended learning outcomes, clearly grounded on a close familiarity with a wide range of supporting evidence, constructively utilised to reveal appreciable depth of understanding 50% to 59% Satisfactory pass Clear attainment of most of the intended learning outcomes, some more securely grasped than others, resting on a circumscribed range of evidence and displaying a variable depth of understanding 40% to 49% Marginal Fail Attainment deficient in respect of specific intended learning outcomes, with mixed evidence as to the depth of knowledge and weak deployment of arguments or deficient manipulations 30% - Fail Attainment of intended learning outcomes appreciably deficient in critical39% respects, lacking secure basis in relevant factual and analytical dimensions 0% - 29% Poor Fail Attainment of intended learning outcomes appreciably deficient in respect of nearly all intended learning outcomes, with irrelevant use of materials and incomplete and flawed explanation |
|
| Szczegółowe treści kształcenia: | |
|
| Literatura: |
(tylko po angielsku) Obligatory literature: Tourish, D., 2020. The triumph of nonsense in management studies. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(1), pp.99-109. Jalalian, M., 2012. Writing an eye-catching and evocative abstract for a research article: A comprehensive and practical approach. Electronic Physician, 4(3), pp.520-524. Cioffi, F. and Cioffi, F.L., 2017. The imaginative argument. Princeton University Press. Wingate, U., 2012. ‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for academic purposes, 11(2), pp.145-154. Efron, S.E. and Ravid, R., 2018. Writing the literature review: A Practical Guide. Steward, B., 2004. Writing a literature review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(11), pp.495-500. Imel, S., 2011. Writing a literature review. The handbook of scholarly writing and publishing, 145. Della Porta, D. and Keating, M. eds., 2008. Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press. Read this material on the NCBI website for quantitative data. Read this material on the NCBI website for qualitative data Perneger, T.V. and Hudelson, P.M., 2004. Writing a research article: advice to beginners. International journal for quality in health care, 16(3), pp.191-192. Taylor and Francis guide to writing for publication in their journals Short, free course via Future Learn to improve academic English University of Wolverhampton guide to proof reading Lăzăroiu, G., 2012. The pressure of publishing in Academia. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 7(1), pp.120-125. Supplementary literature: Alasuutari, P., Bickman, L. and Brannen, J. eds., 2008. The SAGE handbook of social research methods. Sage. Murray, R., 2013. Writing for academic journals. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Paltridge, B., 2020. Writing for academic journals in the digital era. RELC Journal, 51(1), pp.147-157. |
|
Właścicielem praw autorskich jest UNIWERSYTET ŁÓDZKI.
